START HERE / 05

Review and Revise.

Judge the quality of the decision using what was knowable at the time, then improve the rule rather than rewriting the story.

YOUR OUTPUTProcess assessmentOutcome contextSystem lessonRule revision

GOOD PROCESSGOOD OUTCOMEReinforce what worked

GOOD PROCESSBAD OUTCOMEInspect uncertainty

WEAK PROCESSGOOD OUTCOMEDo not reward luck

WEAK PROCESSBAD OUTCOMERevise the rule

0 of 7 answered0%

How does the outcome compare with the original expectation?

Better than expectedBroadly as expectedWorse than expectedToo early to judge

How closely did you follow the process defined before the decision?

I followed the defined processI followed it with minor departuresI made material departuresNo process was recorded

Was the evidence sufficient for the decision at that time?

Sufficient for the decision at the timeUseful, but important gaps remainedKey evidence was missing or unverifiedThe evidence was not recorded

How was uncertainty handled before commitment?

Explicitly identified and boundedIdentified but not reflected in sizingMostly downplayed after commitmentNot recorded

What currently appears to have driven the result?

The original thesis was the main driverPosition sizing and portfolio construction mattered mostExternal events dominated the resultLuck or short-term noise may dominate

Which part of the system most needs attention?

Keep the current ruleStrengthen the evidence standardChange sizing or concentration limitsAdd a pause or review trigger

What rule will you keep, remove or change before the next decision?

Revise the system, not the past.

Answer all seven questions to create your review.